“1000 Years in Hilden – The Paths of Time“, a tapestry
History bears witness to what happened in the past and is happening in the present with regard to both mankind and nature. The study of history has developed its own methods, language and ways of thinking. It has defined aspects for examination and linked them to other sciences, not only in order to describe, but also to research the connections between causes, sequences of events, developments and effects.
When it explains facts, illuminates meanings, history becomes interpretation that is influenced by cultural-spiritual conditioning, the thirst for knowledge and objectives.
Language is its essential mediating agent.
Art is a medium of perception with a fundamentally iconic structure that is accessed via visual perception. Yet there is no pictorial science which corresponds to linguistics, even though for thousands of years humans have made themselves understood by scratching signs and pictures in wood and stone, filling them in in colour, distinguishing them by structures. In contrast to the study of history, art is not interested in causes, sequences of events, developments, i.e. the factor of time. As an object of perception, it is defined by space, in which it presents itself, and by timeless presence, from which it offers its open iconic interpretations.
How did Katharina Gun Oehlert approach the incompatibility of the two positions mentioned in the title? Being an artist, it goes without saying that she stripped the historical elements she found on her exploratory search through Hilden’s history of their historical context and transformed them into autonomous motifs in her tapestry, arranging their sequence and relationship not in a scientific context, but within the iconic context of the superordinate whole of the tapestry.
This artistic freedom to treat historical documents in a way that does not destroy their “readability“ was only be achieved by making them part of a great parable of unfathomable nature, so that they became the tangible open “ground“ on which history took place. Thus, she first devised a coloured space for her picture that covered the entire surface in warm earth colours, structured this with clods of earth, cracks and crevisses that are interrupted by the luminous blue of flowing water. On the left, from the depths of unknown times, the surface of the earth develops out of a light “non-colouredness“ in which the sun stands as a symbol of life and the beginning. To the right, the space on the tapestry ends in a similarly pale, light colour: the future in the sense of the unknown, undefined. The artist places the greatest contrasts in colour, the luminous intensity of the dramatic light-dark, in the middle of the tapestry, the place where the knowledge of history will be portrayed in its most distinct and richest way.
The woven “skin“ of this portrayal, which is a parable of the ground upon which the abstract signs of Hilden’s history were imposed, is materially sensuous and of an intense tactile quality. The special weaving technique invented by Katharina Gun Oehlert gives the woven texture a skinlike softness and warmth, real, palpable folds, ripples and compressions that break the light and cast shadows, causing the colours to vibrate.
In this way, Oehlert achieved a dimension of materially real presence that gives the designed surface a vitality and a life of its own which is open to ever new interpretations. Many things can happen on this ground: traces can be found again and again and be recreated. The surface is not static, but adapts to the imagery of events in a lively and dynamic way from one part of the tapestry to the other.
The artist then spreads out an abundance of copies of historical sketches, groundplans, registers, letters, seals, documents, medallions, portraits, tools, machine parts, etc. from the archives of the city of Hilden over the prepared ground of the painting which fit into it, accentuate and overlap it. This second, abstract dimension of signs and contents which can be understood on a rational level reduces history to a non-generalized presence which does not, however, dominate the ground of this work of art.
A third dimension explains the tension and creative richness of this tapestry. There is a visual leitmotif that counteracts the title and historical facts, an idiosyncratic decision made by the artist. The impact of the composition of this extensive work shows unmistakably that Katharina Gun Oehlert does not regard abstract history as the most important element. Where the facts become blurred, space is set free for the imagination.
How many fantastic figures hide in the contours, shadings, movements of the coloured ground. Almost every contour of the surface anticipates the origin of new forms. Birds, fish, shells, the moon present themselves in a dominant fashion. How threatening the iron horseshoe, how poetic the fabulous figure of the boy with the crowned horse's head.
The blue bird, rising from the terrible abyss of this century’s dark history, storming away into the future, is more meaningful than the signs of industrial development and the ornaments of new streets and motorways.
And the enchanted lovers in the circle of childhood wishes, under the symbol of utopian creativity, in which half technology and half nature fuse together, and which stands for the defiant belief in a more human future.
All the figures are similar in form, like parts that have been extracted from the painted ground, and are transformed into elements of the other dimension – a dimension of emotion, of imagination, dreams, magical relationships, mythical memories and their primal images.
They are all more meaningful and more expressive in the context of a canon of icons and motifs and forms than the historical motifs portrayed.
If we again relate the three creative dimensions of the tapestry to one another, Katharina Gun Oehlert's work contains a bold statement:
The first dimension of the powerful, materially real presence of the surface of this work of art, is a parable of the earth and nature, the basis of creation, of the ground on which history takes place.
The second dimension of abstract-rational signs is a parable of the presence of man in time and space, read in the traces he leaves as evidence of his thinking, working, creating order, of his desire for power and creativity.
The third dimension of the creation of forms is a parable of the realm of the spirit and soul with their ancient themes of feeling and imagination, more closely akin to the ground than history in a concrete sense.
Rosmarie Kesselheim, 2003